tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2546008714740235720.post82602604878052501..comments2024-03-25T07:19:52.909+00:00Comments on The ChEMBL-og: Ligand-based target predictions in ChEMBLUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2546008714740235720.post-79083690318466773162014-05-27T11:26:59.684+01:002014-05-27T11:26:59.684+01:00Thank You for the very interesting work! I have so...Thank You for the very interesting work! I have some questions. First of all, i don't quite understand your validation technique. For example: a compound has 3 targets. Target 1 was found at the first position; target 2 was found at the second position and target 3 was not found in top 10 list of predictions. What did you do exactly in similar cases? Second, how many compounds are there in your training set?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17022207490195479267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2546008714740235720.post-2930844598398405132014-04-14T11:57:46.715+01:002014-04-14T11:57:46.715+01:00Any thoughts on the domain of validity in chemical...Any thoughts on the domain of validity in chemical space of these models? Do you expect them to work well across all of chembl, and if not can you specify what compounds they will fail on?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12289218315702275729noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2546008714740235720.post-72788555770813508012014-04-10T16:34:29.731+01:002014-04-10T16:34:29.731+01:00Very nice post, cheers!Very nice post, cheers!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11584964608865113874noreply@blogger.com