Skip to main content

Using the New ChEMBL Web Services



As promised in our earlier post, here are some more details on making the most of the new ChEMBL web services. The best place to get started is to head over to the  documentation page: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/docs. There you will find the list of resources (e.g. Molecule, Target and Assay) that are available and their methods. More importantly you can also execute each method with your own or default parameters, and view the URL, the response content and response status code. This is definitely the quickest way to start familiarizing yourself with the new ChEMBL web services.

Looking at the resources in more detail, you will find that each resource has three basic methods:

1. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/RESOURCE - will return all available objects of type RESOURCE from ChEMBL. An example could be https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule which returns all molecules (remember that data is paginated - more on this later).

2. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/RESOURCE/ID - will return a single object of type RESOURCE, identified by ID. For some resources, there can be more than one type of ID, for example the Molecule resource will accept:

Note that all three examples above will return the same molecule. The same identifiers are valid for 'substructure' and 'similarity' resources.

Some resources can return more than one object for given ID, for example 'atc_class' will accept any ATC Level as it's ID. Only level 5 is unique across atc_class objects so https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/atc_class/D05AX05 will return a single resource, but https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/atc_class/D will return a list of dermatologicals.

3. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/RESOURCE/set/ID_1;ID_2;...;ID_N - will return N objects of type RESOURCE with IDs in set (ID_1, ID_2,...,ID_N), for example: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule/set/CHEMBL900;CHEMBL1096643;CHEMBL1490 (note that ID separator is semicolon ';').


Format


If you do not specify a format, the default serialisation is XML. Other available formats include JSON and JSONP. There are three ways to provide format information:
  1. Extension, for example https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule/CHEMBL1.json
  2. Format parameter, for example https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule?format=json
  3. Accept header, for example:


For images the available formats are:
  1. png (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/image/CHEMBL1.png)
  2. svg (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/image/CHEMBL1.svg)
  3. json (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/image/CHEMBL1.json)
For png images, please remember that the default chemical rendering uses RDKit but you can always switch to Indigo like this:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/image/CHEMBL1.png?engine=indigo

Changing size works by adding 'dimensions' parameter:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/image/CHEMBL1.png?engine=indigo&dimensions=100

The last thing worth noting about image format is that when you add X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest header to your request (i.e. you make an Ajax call), the resulting image will be base64-encoded. For example to make ajax call using jQuery library and render result as image you can use this code:



Alternatively, if you don't want to explicitly include the header in your jQuery code, you can use crossDomain: false parameter (yes, you are doing a cross-domain request, but we do support CORS so this will work as discussed here):


 

Pagination


When you make the following request https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule only the first 20 molecules will be returned. This corresponds to the first page of the molecule result set being requested. Pagination has been introduced to help reduce server load and also protect us from inadvertent DDoS attacks. It also allows clients to quickly obtain a portion of data without having to wait for the full data set. The most important page parameters are limit and offset, which are illustrated in the image below:


The red border presents a page of limit=10 and offset=10. Limit is a maximum number of objects on single page. Offset is a distance between the first element in result set and the first element in page. Please note, that objects are indexed staring from 0. The default limit is 20 and default offset is 0 and this is why accessing https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule provides first 20 elements. You can increase page size by providing bigger limit parameter, however the  maximum allowed limit value is 1000.

All paginated results come in an 'envelope', which contains a resource object section and page metadata section. An example molecule page in json format looks like:


As can be seen, a 'page' of 20 molecule objects is stored in an array called 'molecules'. A 'page_meta' block provides information on page limit and offset. The 'page_meta' block also provides links (when available), to the previous and next pages and the total object count. In this example you can see that there are 1,463,270 compounds available in ChEMBL. The same information viewed in XML format:


Filtering

 

Filtering can be complex so let's start with the example. In the Molecule resource, there is a 'max_phase' numeric field. This is the maximum phase of development reached by a molecule. 4 is the highest phase and this means the molecule has been approved by the relevant regulatory body, such as the FDA. So let's select all approved drugs by adding a filter to the max_phase field:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule.json?max_phase=4

OK, so now we know that the filter can be passed as parameters and the simplest form is <field_name>=<value>, which means that we expect to get only items with field_name exactly matching the specified value. Right, let's add another filter. Inside a Molecule resource, we can find 'molecule_properties' object nested. One of the properties is a number of aromatic rings, so let's select compounds with at least two:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule.json?max_phase=4&molecule_properties__aromatic_rings__gte=2

Now we see, that many filters can be joined together using '&' sign. If the filter applies to the nested attribute we have to provide the name of the nested object first, followed by the name of the attribute, using double underscore '__' as a separator. Because we don't want to have an exact match, we have to explicitly specify the name of the relation, in our case 'greater then or equal' (gte). There are many other types of relations we can use in filters:

Filter Types
Description
Example
exact (iexact)
Exact match with query
contains (icontains)
Wild card search with query
startswith (istartswith)
Starts with query
endswith (iendswith)
Ends with query
regex (iregex)
Regular expression query
gt (gte)
Greater than (or equal)
lt (lte)
Less than (or equal)
range
Within a range of values
in
Appears within list of query values
isnull
Field is null

Please note, that you can't use every relation for every type. For example regex matching is not allowed on numeric fields and ordering is forbidden on text. If you want to check, which filters can be applied to which resource, you can take a look at the resource schema, for example the 'molecule' resource, schema is available here:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule/schema.json

Ordering


Ordering is similar to filtering. As an example let's sort molecules by their molecular weight. There is a field called 'full_mwt' inside molecule properties, so ordering will look like this:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule.json?order_by=molecule_properties__full_mwt

And as we see, Helium is our first compound. In order to sort, we just have to add 'order_by' parameter with the value being the name of the field, prefixed with all intermediate nested objects. By default we sort ascending. To reverse this order and get molecules sorted from the heaviest to the lightest we have to add minus '-' sign before field name like this:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule.json?molecule_properties__isnull=false&order_by=-molecule_properties__full_mwt

This time the first element is a very heavy compound. Note that we had to add a filter to eliminate compounds without specified weight, otherwise, they will stick to the top of the results (This is because NULLS FIRST is the default for descending order in Oracle DB which we are using in production as described here). We can have multiple 'order_by' params in the URL like here:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/molecule.json?order_by=molecule_properties__aromatic_rings&order_by=-molecule_properties__full_mwt

In which case molecules will be first sorted by the number of aromatic rings in ascending order, followed by molecular weight in descending order.

Filtering and ordering can be mixed together, but we leave it as an example for the reader.

Equivalent Web Service Requests 


We will continue to support the 'old' web services until the end of the year. To help users with the upcoming migration process, the table below provides a mapping between the example web services requests found in the old documentation to the equivalent call in the new web services. It will be up to the end user to handle the different response format and the pagination of the returned data.


Description
Old Web Service URL
New Web Service URL
Check API status
Get compound by ChEMBLID
Get compound by Standard InChiKey
Get list of compounds matching Canonical SMILES
Get list of compounds containing the substructure represented by a given Canonical SMILES
Get list of compounds similar to the one represented by a given Canonical SMILES, at a given cutoff percentage
Get image of a ChEMBL compound by ChEMBLID
Get individual compound bioactivities
Get alternative compound forms (e.g. parent and salts) of a compound
Get mechanism of action details for compound (where compound is a drug)
Get all targets
Get target by ChEMBLID
Get target by UniProt Accession Identifier
Get individual target bioactivities
Get approved drugs for target
Get assay by ChEMBLID
Get individual assay bioactivities

ChEMBL Targets and UniProt Accessions


It is also worth noting that requests for ChEMBL targets by UniProt accessions is handled slightly differently in the new web services. It is now possible to return complexes, protein families and other target types, which contain the UniProt accession, not just the single protein targets. For example https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/target?target_components__accession=Q13936&target_type=SINGLE%20PROTEIN, will return the ChEMBL target for Q13936. Removing the target_type filter, https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/target?target_components__accession=Q13936, will return multiple targets (CHEMBL2095229, CHEMBL2363032 and CHEMBL1940 in ChEMBL release 20).

Expect some more web service related blog posts over the coming weeks and if you have any questions please get in touch.

The ChEMBL Team

 

 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Improvements in SureChEMBL's chemistry search and adoption of RDKit

    Dear SureChEMBL users, If you frequently rely on our "chemistry search" feature, today brings great news! We’ve recently implemented a major update that makes your search experience faster than ever. What's New? Last week, we upgraded our structure search engine by aligning it with the core code base used in ChEMBL . This update allows SureChEMBL to leverage our FPSim2 Python package , returning results in approximately one second. The similarity search relies on 256-bit RDKit -calculated ECFP4 fingerprints, and a single instance requires approximately 1 GB of RAM to run. SureChEMBL’s FPSim2 file is not currently available for download, but we are considering generating it periodicaly and have created it once for you to try in Google Colab ! For substructure searches, we now also use an RDKit -based solution via SubstructLibrary , which returns results several times faster than our previous implementation. Additionally, structure search results are now sorted by

Improved querying for SureChEMBL

    Dear SureChEMBL users, Earlier this year we ran a survey to identify what you, the users, would like to see next in SureChEMBL. Thank you for offering your feedback! This gave us the opportunity to have some interesting discussions both internally and externally. While we can't publicly reveal precisely our plans for the coming months (everything will be delivered at the right time), we can at least say that improving the compound structure extraction quality is a priority. Unfortunately, the change won't happen overnight as reprocessing 167 millions patents takes a while. However, the good news is that the new generation of optical chemical structure recognition shows good performance, even for patent images! We hope we can share our results with you soon. So in the meantime, what are we doing? You may have noticed a few changes on the SureChEMBL main page. No more "Beta" flag since we consider the system to be stable enough (it does not mean that you will never

ChEMBL brings drug bioactivity data to the Protein Data Bank in Europe

In the quest to develop new drugs, understanding the 3D structure of molecules is crucial. Resources like the Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) provide these 3D blueprints for many biological molecules. However, researchers also need to know how these molecules interact with their biological target – their bioactivity. ChEMBL is a treasure trove of bioactivity data for countless drug-like molecules. It tells us how strongly a molecule binds to a target, how it affects a biological process, and even how it might be metabolized. But here's the catch: while ChEMBL provides extensive information on a molecule's activity and cross references to other data sources, it doesn't always tell us if a 3D structure is available for a specific drug-target complex. This can be a roadblock for researchers who need that structural information to design effective drugs. Therefore, connecting ChEMBL data with resources like PDBe and CSD is essen

ChEMBL 34 is out!

We are delighted to announce the release of ChEMBL 34, which includes a full update to drug and clinical candidate drug data. This version of the database, prepared on 28/03/2024 contains:         2,431,025 compounds (of which 2,409,270 have mol files)         3,106,257 compound records (non-unique compounds)         20,772,701 activities         1,644,390 assays         15,598 targets         89,892 documents Data can be downloaded from the ChEMBL FTP site:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/ Please see ChEMBL_34 release notes for full details of all changes in this release:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/chembl_34_release_notes.txt New Data Sources European Medicines Agency (src_id = 66): European Medicines Agency's data correspond to EMA drugs prior to 20 January 2023 (excluding vaccines). 71 out of the 882 newly added EMA drugs are only authorised by EMA, rather than from other regulatory bodies e.g.

In search of the perfect assay description

Credit: Science biotech, CC BY-SA 4.0 Assays des cribe the experimental set-up when testing the activity of drug-like compounds against biological targets; they provide useful context for researchers interested in drug-target relationships. Ver sion 33 of ChEMBL contains 1.6 million diverse assays spanning ADMET, physicochemical, binding, functional and toxicity experiments. A set of well-defined and structured assay descriptions would be valuable for the drug discovery community, particularly for text mining and NLP projects. These would also support ChEMBL's ongoing efforts towards an  in vitro  assay classification. This Blog post will consider the features of the 'perfect' assay description and provide a guide for depositors on the submission of high quality data. ChEMBL's assays are typically structured with the overall aim, target, and method .  The ideal assay description is succinct but contains all the necessary information for easy interpretation by database u