Skip to main content

New Drug Approvals 2011 - Pt. XXXI Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi (ErwinazeTM)






ATC code: L01XX02


On November 18, the FDA approved asparaginase from Erwinia chrysanthemi for the treatment of patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have become allergic to the E. coli asparaginase that is conventionally used for the treatment of ALL patients.

ALL is a cancer of the white blood cells and can be fatal within weeks from the onset of the disease if it is left untreated. In ALL, there is an unproportional increase in the population of immature white blood cells, which crowd out functional immune cells as well as red blood cells and platelets, and in advanced stages of the disease infiltrate into tissues and organs, most frequently liver, spleen and lymph nodes. The symptoms of ALL in its initial stages are fatigue, anemia, frequent infections and fever as well as breathlessness and prolonged bleeding. ALL is caused by DNA damage and associated with exposure to radiation and cancerogenic chemicals. There are a number of typical chromosomal translocations, the most frequent in adults with ALL is the so called Philadelphia chromosome, where a translocation of chromosomes 9 and 22 results in the formation of the fusion gene bcr-abl (CHEMBL1862). Treatment of ALL is usually encompasses the three phases i) remission induction, which aims to quickly kill off 95% of the cancerous cells, ii) consolidation to further reduce the tumor burden and iii) maintenance with the aim to prevent a relapse caused by stray surviving leukemic cells.

Aspariginase is part of the remission induction regimen and used in combination with other cytostatic and cytotoxic drugs including prednisolone (CHEMBL131), dexamethasone (CHEMBL384467) , vincristin (CHEMBL303560) and daunorubicin (CHEMBL178). Asparaginase is an enzyme (EC 3.5.1.1) that catalyzes the hydrolysis of asparagine (CHEBI:17196)  to aspartic acid (CHEBI17053) as shown below. Unlike healthy body cells, leukemic cells rely on the presence of extracellular asparagine for protein metabolism and survival, hence the beneficial effect for ALL patients. Conventionally, asparaginase for he treatment of ALL is derived from the bacterium Escherichia coli (corresponds to Uniprot:P00805) but some patients (estimated 10-15%) become allergic to this enzyme. For these patients, the ortholog from the bacterium Erwinia crysanthemi (Uniprot-Id P06608) is available to replace the untolerated treatment.

Asparaginase catalyzes the hydrolysis of asparagine to aspartic acid.
Asparaginase Erwinia crysanthemi is a tetrameric enzyme composed of four identical subunits each weighing about 35kDa. The crystal structures of many asparaginase enzymes are known, including that of the closely related protein from Erwinia carotovora (PDBe:2jk0)


The recommended dosage is 25.000 International Units/m2 (International Units compare biological activity relative to an arbitrary amount of the active ingredient, square meter refers to body surface) three times a week. The route of administration is intramuscular injection.

The pharmakokinetic paramaters of Erwinaze were not determined in clinical trials, serum concentrations greater than 0.1 International Units/mL were reached by all patients within 72 hours of the third injection of aspariginase Erwinia chrysanthemi.

Side effects reported in the study include serious hypersensitivity reactions, pancreatitis, glucose intolerance, thrombosis and hemorrhage.

Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi is marketed in the US by Eusa Pharma under the trade name Erwinaze. In a number of other countries, it is available under the name Erwinase.

Package information can be found here.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Improvements in SureChEMBL's chemistry search and adoption of RDKit

    Dear SureChEMBL users, If you frequently rely on our "chemistry search" feature, today brings great news! We’ve recently implemented a major update that makes your search experience faster than ever. What's New? Last week, we upgraded our structure search engine by aligning it with the core code base used in ChEMBL . This update allows SureChEMBL to leverage our FPSim2 Python package , returning results in approximately one second. The similarity search relies on 256-bit RDKit -calculated ECFP4 fingerprints, and a single instance requires approximately 1 GB of RAM to run. SureChEMBL’s FPSim2 file is not currently available for download, but we are considering generating it periodicaly and have created it once for you to try in Google Colab ! For substructure searches, we now also use an RDKit -based solution via SubstructLibrary , which returns results several times faster than our previous implementation. Additionally, structure search results are now sorted by

Improved querying for SureChEMBL

    Dear SureChEMBL users, Earlier this year we ran a survey to identify what you, the users, would like to see next in SureChEMBL. Thank you for offering your feedback! This gave us the opportunity to have some interesting discussions both internally and externally. While we can't publicly reveal precisely our plans for the coming months (everything will be delivered at the right time), we can at least say that improving the compound structure extraction quality is a priority. Unfortunately, the change won't happen overnight as reprocessing 167 millions patents takes a while. However, the good news is that the new generation of optical chemical structure recognition shows good performance, even for patent images! We hope we can share our results with you soon. So in the meantime, what are we doing? You may have noticed a few changes on the SureChEMBL main page. No more "Beta" flag since we consider the system to be stable enough (it does not mean that you will never

ChEMBL brings drug bioactivity data to the Protein Data Bank in Europe

In the quest to develop new drugs, understanding the 3D structure of molecules is crucial. Resources like the Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) provide these 3D blueprints for many biological molecules. However, researchers also need to know how these molecules interact with their biological target – their bioactivity. ChEMBL is a treasure trove of bioactivity data for countless drug-like molecules. It tells us how strongly a molecule binds to a target, how it affects a biological process, and even how it might be metabolized. But here's the catch: while ChEMBL provides extensive information on a molecule's activity and cross references to other data sources, it doesn't always tell us if a 3D structure is available for a specific drug-target complex. This can be a roadblock for researchers who need that structural information to design effective drugs. Therefore, connecting ChEMBL data with resources like PDBe and CSD is essen

ChEMBL 34 is out!

We are delighted to announce the release of ChEMBL 34, which includes a full update to drug and clinical candidate drug data. This version of the database, prepared on 28/03/2024 contains:         2,431,025 compounds (of which 2,409,270 have mol files)         3,106,257 compound records (non-unique compounds)         20,772,701 activities         1,644,390 assays         15,598 targets         89,892 documents Data can be downloaded from the ChEMBL FTP site:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/ Please see ChEMBL_34 release notes for full details of all changes in this release:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/chembl_34_release_notes.txt New Data Sources European Medicines Agency (src_id = 66): European Medicines Agency's data correspond to EMA drugs prior to 20 January 2023 (excluding vaccines). 71 out of the 882 newly added EMA drugs are only authorised by EMA, rather than from other regulatory bodies e.g.

A python client for accessing ChEMBL web services

Motivation The CheMBL Web Services provide simple reliable programmatic access to the data stored in ChEMBL database. RESTful API approaches are quite easy to master in most languages but still require writing a few lines of code. Additionally, it can be a challenging task to write a nontrivial application using REST without any examples. These factors were the motivation for us to write a small client library for accessing web services from Python. Why Python? We choose this language because Python has become extremely popular (and still growing in use) in scientific applications; there are several Open Source chemical toolkits available in this language, and so the wealth of ChEMBL resources and functionality of those toolkits can be easily combined. Moreover, Python is a very web-friendly language and we wanted to show how easy complex resource acquisition can be expressed in Python. Reinventing the wheel? There are already some libraries providing access to ChEMBL d