Skip to main content

Help us prioritise!

Over the years we've added many new features to ChEMBL and some of these have proved to be particularly valuable to our users. However, our resources are finite, and in order to continue to bring you exciting new improvements, we may sometimes need to re-evalutate features that are not well used and/or costly to maintain. To get the clearest possible view of which of our current data types, formats and access mechanisms are most important to you, we've put together a brief survey. If you're using ChEMBL (whether frequently or not), please help us by completing this - it should only take a couple of minutes!

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/DJ5HPF2

The survey is anonymous and will remain open until 31st October. Thanks in advance for your help.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ChEMBL 31 is out!

  We are pleased to announce the release of ChEMBL 31! This version of the database, prepared on 12/07/2022 contains: 2,967,627 compound records 2,331,700 compounds (of which 2,304,875 have mol files) 19,780,369 activities 1,498,681 assays 15,072 targets 85,431 documents New Data Sources MMV Malaria HGL Fraunhofer HDAC6 Updated Data Sources Scientific Literature Patent Bioactivity Data Donated Chemical Probes - SGC Frankfurt EUbOpen Chemogenomic Library Newly Deposited Datasets CHEMBL4888484 - Replenishing the malaria drug discovery pipeline CHEMBL4808148 - HDAC6 screening dataset CHEMBL4879553 - Data for DCP probe BAY1125976 CHEMBL4879554 - Data for DCP probe GNE-2256 Database changes since the last release: No schema changes. Funding acknowledgements Work contributing to ChEMBL31 was funded by the Wellcome Trust,  EMBL Member States, Open Targets, National Institutes of Health (NIH),  EU Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)

LSH-based similarity search in MongoDB is faster than postgres cartridge.

TL;DR: In his excellent blog post , Matt Swain described the implementation of compound similarity searches in MongoDB . Unfortunately, Matt's approach had suboptimal ( polynomial ) time complexity with respect to decreasing similarity thresholds, which renders unsuitable for production environments. In this article, we improve on the method by enhancing it with Locality Sensitive Hashing algorithm, which significantly reduces query time and outperforms RDKit PostgreSQL cartridge . myChEMBL 21 - NoSQL edition    Given that NoSQL technologies applied to computational chemistry and cheminformatics are gaining traction and popularity, we decided to include a taster in future myChEMBL releases. Two especially appealing technologies are Neo4j and MongoDB . The former is a graph database and the latter is a BSON document storage. We would like to provide IPython notebook -based tutorials explaining how to use this software to deal with common cheminformatics p

ChEMBL 30 released

  We are pleased to announce the release of ChEMBL 30. This version of the database, prepared on 22/02/2022 contains: 2,786,911 compound records 2,157,379 compounds (of which 2,136,187 have mol files) 19,286,751 activities 1,458,215 assays 14,855 targets 84,092 documents Data can be downloaded from the ChEMBL FTP site: https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_30/ Please see ChEMBL_30 release notes for full details of all changes in this release:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_30/chembl_30_release_notes.txt New Deposited Datasets EUbOPEN Chemogenomic Library (src_id = 55, ChEMBL Document ID CHEMBL4689842):   The EUbOPEN consortium is an Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) funded project to enable and unlock biology in the open. The aims of the project are to assemble an open access chemogenomic library comprising about 5,000 well annotated compounds covering roughly 1,000 different proteins, to synthesize at least

A python client for accessing ChEMBL web services

Motivation The CheMBL Web Services provide simple reliable programmatic access to the data stored in ChEMBL database. RESTful API approaches are quite easy to master in most languages but still require writing a few lines of code. Additionally, it can be a challenging task to write a nontrivial application using REST without any examples. These factors were the motivation for us to write a small client library for accessing web services from Python. Why Python? We choose this language because Python has become extremely popular (and still growing in use) in scientific applications; there are several Open Source chemical toolkits available in this language, and so the wealth of ChEMBL resources and functionality of those toolkits can be easily combined. Moreover, Python is a very web-friendly language and we wanted to show how easy complex resource acquisition can be expressed in Python. Reinventing the wheel? There are already some libraries providing access to ChEMBL d