Skip to main content

A Taxonomy for Drugs: 1 - Drug Class



It is intuitive to describe what a drug is in natural language - a small molecule, etc, but one problem is that these descriptive terms are context dependent, loosely defined and are used very variably across the literature; and so when someone asks 'How many small molecule drugs there are?' - first of all it depends on what is a 'drug', and secondly what is a 'small molecule'. As far as I can tell there is not a descriptive taxonomy for drugs (I use the term taxonomy here as a bridge term between a controlled vocabulary/dictionary and an ontology). For our own purposes within ChEMBL we need such a taxonomy, but post our initial thoughts here for comment, and no doubt (and hopefully), significant correction and improvement (use the comment section of the blog, then everyone can see any discussions).

Drugs are regulated products that are 'intended use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease' - let's not visit what a disease is, but move swiftly on to trying to sub divide this into obvious and useful categories/classes when thinking about molecular drug structures.

So for a Drug_Class, categorisation into the following seems intuitive and useful. Most of the action in drug discovery will be connected to the "Therapeutic" class.
  • Therapeutic - A substance with a curative action on a disease.
  • Supplement - A substance, used to address a deficiency of that substance (or of that substances normal function).
  • Imaging Agent - A substance used to image a molecule or structure within the body.
  • Diagnostic Agent - A substance used in the diagnosis of a disease, not involving imaging.
  • Other - A substance not covered by the categories above.
Drugs are then typically divided into Drug_Types - small molecules and biologicals.
  • Small Molecule - A substance with a molecular weight less than 1500 Da that is otherwise not a Biological.
  • Biological - A substance primarily composed from monomers of naturally occuring substances (e.g. amino-acids, sugars, nucleotides, etc.).
  • Other - A substance not covered by the categories above.
I hate these sort of self referential/recursive definitions, but please mail improvements! Within each of these two main classes there are some relevant, pragmatic and useful subdivisions - Drug_Type_Subclass.

For Small Molecules:
  • Inorganic - A non-organic substance.
  • Natural Product-derived - A substance that is derived from a naturally occurring primary or secondary metabolite.
  • Synthetic - An organic substance that is not derived from a naturally occurring priamry or secondary metabolite.
  • Other - A substance that is a Small Molecule which is not covered by the categories above.
For Biologicals:
  • Monoclonal antibody (mAb) - A substance similar in sequence to an antibody sequence.
  • Vaccine - A substance that acts through eliciting an acquired immune response in the patient.
  • Enzyme - A substance acting as a catalyst for a chemical reaction.
  • Virus - A substance with the biological characteristics of a competant virus.
  • Cell - A substance with the biological characteristics of a competant cell.
  • Peptide - A substance which is a polymer built primarily from amino acids, containing between two and twenty amino acids.
  • Protein - A substance which is a polymer built primarily from amino acids, containing in excess of twenty amino acids, and that is not a monoclonal antibody.
  • Oligosaccharide - A substance which is a polymer built primarily from sugar-like monomers.
  • Oligonucleotide - A substance which is a polymer built primarily from nucleotide-like monomers.
  • Other - A substance which is not covered by the categories above.
So, a consistent, semantically useful description of a specific drug is constructed from a combination of Drug_Type_Subclass, Drug_Type, and Drug_Class.

For example:

Sildenafil is a "synthetic small molecule therapeutic"
Abciximab is a "monoclonal antibody biological therapeutic".
Vitamin D3 is a "natural product-derived small molecule supplement".
Ioflupane 123I is a "synthetic small molecule imaging agent"

 Any feedback, pointers to any existing classifications/taxonomies, etc. would be very welcome.

Parts 2, 3 and 4 for this Drug taxonomy will be posted shortly.

Comments

Great post! Any chance we see a follow up post touching the 'racemic mixture' issue we were discussing the other day?
Frank Gibson said…
It may be a case that your definition of a drug is slightly narrower that all drugs, and this is a good thing to be focused on scope. You elude to the fact that "the notion of a drug" is something that a small molecule et al, can do/perform like, as opposed to "it is".
Therefore, we could have a general definition of drug along the lines of

Def= A drug is a role borne by a material that is realized (the material is classified as a drug when) in a process of absorption by an organism or an entity of organism origin (i.e. cell line) that, alters, or effects a function or functions which inhere in the organism or entity of organism origin.

Then your definition of a drug could be a subclass of drug and be called, regulated_drug with the following definition.

Def= A regulated_drug is a drug (def above) that has an intended use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease and is regulated or approved by an regulatory organisation/authority.

For the rest of the definitions it may be helpful to think in terms of both the physical thing that has the role drug and the process that occurs, so for example you have the process Therapeutic_effect and a therapeutic is a drug that acts as a participant in the therapeutic_effect_process to cause/contribute to the therapeutic_effect observed.

For imaging and diagnostics it may be helpful to think of these materials as a proxy for the end result. i.e. facilitates imaging, or facilitates a diagnosis by proxy.

P.S I don't know what "naturally" means in relation to supplement, I am not sure I would describe Berocca as natural :)
jpo said…
Thanks!

Our use of the word drug within the group refers to a regulated substance, with a defined chemical composition (biologicals ften do not have a completely characterised composition, and can be a population of closely related chemical species).

Before Drugs come Clinical Candidates, and these have their own definitions, accepted terms, etc. This is another area where we are developing a taxonomy, as are the therapeutic effects you mention.

Naturally occurring is a difficult thing as well when you want to pin a precise definition to it. For us, the intent is to capture cases where the molecule either is, or is closely chemically related to, a natural metabolite. If this naturally occurring molecule has some therapeutic effect, and requires being regulated by the FDA, EMEA, etc. - So I guess the commercial product you mention will be out of scope.
Thank's a lot! Can I translate this post with comments and examples to Russian?
jpo said…
Of course !
jpo said…
Wikipedia has a good subclassification of monoclonal antibody subtypes, and this is almost certainly worth incorporating into a useful taxonomy.

mab: whole monoclonal antibody
F(ab')2: fragment, antigen-binding, including hinge region (both arms)
Fab': fragment, antigen-binding, including hinge region (one arm)
scFv: single-chain variable fragment
di-scFv: dimeric single-chain variable fragment
sdAb: single-domain antibody
3funct: trifunctional antibody
BiTE: bi-specific T-cell engager
Unknown said…
I'd add "palliative" and "disease-mitigating" (applicable, respectively, e.g. to analgesics and antiretroviral HIV/AIDS drugs) to "curative" under the therapeutics category. Great discussion!

Popular posts from this blog

Here's a nice Christmas gift - ChEMBL 35 is out!

Use your well-deserved Christmas holidays to spend time with your loved ones and explore the new release of ChEMBL 35!            This fresh release comes with a wealth of new data sets and some new data sources as well. Examples include a total of 14 datasets deposited by by the ASAP ( AI-driven Structure-enabled Antiviral Platform) project, a new NTD data se t by Aberystwyth University on anti-schistosome activity, nine new chemical probe data sets, and seven new data sets for the Chemogenomic library of the EUbOPEN project. We also inlcuded a few new fields that do impr ove the provenance and FAIRness of the data we host in ChEMBL:  1) A CONTACT field has been added to the DOCs table which should contain a contact profile of someone willing to be contacted about details of the dataset (ideally an ORCID ID; up to 3 contacts can be provided). 2) In an effort to provide more detailed information about the source of a deposited dat...

Improvements in SureChEMBL's chemistry search and adoption of RDKit

    Dear SureChEMBL users, If you frequently rely on our "chemistry search" feature, today brings great news! We’ve recently implemented a major update that makes your search experience faster than ever. What's New? Last week, we upgraded our structure search engine by aligning it with the core code base used in ChEMBL . This update allows SureChEMBL to leverage our FPSim2 Python package , returning results in approximately one second. The similarity search relies on 256-bit RDKit -calculated ECFP4 fingerprints, and a single instance requires approximately 1 GB of RAM to run. SureChEMBL’s FPSim2 file is not currently available for download, but we are considering generating it periodicaly and have created it once for you to try in Google Colab ! For substructure searches, we now also use an RDKit -based solution via SubstructLibrary , which returns results several times faster than our previous implementation. Additionally, structure search results are now sorted by...

ChEMBL 34 is out!

We are delighted to announce the release of ChEMBL 34, which includes a full update to drug and clinical candidate drug data. This version of the database, prepared on 28/03/2024 contains:         2,431,025 compounds (of which 2,409,270 have mol files)         3,106,257 compound records (non-unique compounds)         20,772,701 activities         1,644,390 assays         15,598 targets         89,892 documents Data can be downloaded from the ChEMBL FTP site:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/ Please see ChEMBL_34 release notes for full details of all changes in this release:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/chembl_34_release_notes.txt New Data Sources European Medicines Agency (src_id = 66): European Medicines Agency's data correspond to EMA drugs prior to 20 January 2023 (excluding ...

Improved querying for SureChEMBL

    Dear SureChEMBL users, Earlier this year we ran a survey to identify what you, the users, would like to see next in SureChEMBL. Thank you for offering your feedback! This gave us the opportunity to have some interesting discussions both internally and externally. While we can't publicly reveal precisely our plans for the coming months (everything will be delivered at the right time), we can at least say that improving the compound structure extraction quality is a priority. Unfortunately, the change won't happen overnight as reprocessing 167 millions patents takes a while. However, the good news is that the new generation of optical chemical structure recognition shows good performance, even for patent images! We hope we can share our results with you soon. So in the meantime, what are we doing? You may have noticed a few changes on the SureChEMBL main page. No more "Beta" flag since we consider the system to be stable enough (it does not mean that you will never ...

ChEMBL brings drug bioactivity data to the Protein Data Bank in Europe

In the quest to develop new drugs, understanding the 3D structure of molecules is crucial. Resources like the Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) provide these 3D blueprints for many biological molecules. However, researchers also need to know how these molecules interact with their biological target – their bioactivity. ChEMBL is a treasure trove of bioactivity data for countless drug-like molecules. It tells us how strongly a molecule binds to a target, how it affects a biological process, and even how it might be metabolized. But here's the catch: while ChEMBL provides extensive information on a molecule's activity and cross references to other data sources, it doesn't always tell us if a 3D structure is available for a specific drug-target complex. This can be a roadblock for researchers who need that structural information to design effective drugs. Therefore, connecting ChEMBL data with resources like PDBe and CSD is essen...