Skip to main content

A Taxonomy for Drugs: 2 - Stereochemistry


The next area for consideration in our descriptive taxonomy for drugs is stereochemistry. There are many differing types of stereoisomers encountered in general chemistry, and the area is complex, but the majority of these are not relevant for drug discovery; for example atropisomers, although an important effect is not important for among drug substances. The most significant category of stereochemistry for drug like molecules involves chiral centers at sp3 hybridised carbon atoms connected to four chemically distinct atoms (often giving rise to enantiomerism). Another relevant case of stereoisomerism for drugs are diastereoisomers, these are stereoisomers that are not enantiomers, and include cis-/trans- (E-/Z-) configuration of alkenes.

So for Drug_Stereochemistry_Class, a drug can be:
  • Chiral - containing a single defined stereoisomer of the drug substance, and which lacks an internal plane of symmetry.
  • Racemic - containing a mixture of stereoisomers of the drug substance.
  • Achiral - composed of a drug substance that does not display chirality.
  • Other - displaying a physiologically relevant stereochemical property not covered by the classes above.
The vast majority of biological monomers (e.g. amino acids, nucleotides, sugars)  are chiral, and polymers of these are also chiral (so biological drugs and drug targets within the body). So biological drugs are 'chiral', but since it is so ubiquitous for molecules of this class, the convention is to ignore the issue of chirality for biologicals. For small molecule drugs, the importance is more significant, both scientifically and commercially, and several drugs which were initially synthesized and marketed as racemic mixtures, have subsequently been developed in a chirally pure form. An example of this is Omeprazole, which was subsequently replaced by the 'active' S-enantiomer Esomeprazole. By convention, USANs and INNs for chirally distinct forms of a molecule have either ar- as a prefix for R-configuration and es- as a prefix for S-configuration forms. There is no correlation between the +/- labelling and R/S labelling of chirally active molecules. Previously, the USANs/INNs of chirally pure drugs were often denoted with levo- and dextro- prefices.

It is important to note that since drugs tend to interact with chiral receptors, enantiomers will have different binding affinities against a target (or set of targets), metabolic routes, side-effects, half-lives, etc., and so in general there is usually more interest in developing a chirally pure or achiral drug. Chiral centers often add significantly to the synthetic complexity and cost of manufacture of a drug, and so again there are pressures to develop achiral drugs where possible. So as a general rule, achiral drugs are 'preferred' over chiral drugs which in turn are preferred over racemic drugs. There is a fuller discussion of isomerism and drug development here.

Although most chirality in drugs occurs at sp3 carbon atoms, an important and often neglected case is for sulfoxides, where the geometry around the sulphur atom is tetrahedral, and optically active isomers are possible.

For example:

Sildenafil is an achiral drug.
Levodopa is a chiral drug.
Armodafanil is a chiral drug (containing a chiral sulfoxide).
Citalopram is a racemic drug.
Abciximab is a chiral drug.

Comments

jpo said…
Oh, I forgot to say. Enatiomers will have identical physical properties (like logP, logS, etc), diastereoisomers won't.

Popular posts from this blog

Improvements in SureChEMBL's chemistry search and adoption of RDKit

    Dear SureChEMBL users, If you frequently rely on our "chemistry search" feature, today brings great news! We’ve recently implemented a major update that makes your search experience faster than ever. What's New? Last week, we upgraded our structure search engine by aligning it with the core code base used in ChEMBL . This update allows SureChEMBL to leverage our FPSim2 Python package , returning results in approximately one second. The similarity search relies on 256-bit RDKit -calculated ECFP4 fingerprints, and a single instance requires approximately 1 GB of RAM to run. SureChEMBL’s FPSim2 file is not currently available for download, but we are considering generating it periodicaly and have created it once for you to try in Google Colab ! For substructure searches, we now also use an RDKit -based solution via SubstructLibrary , which returns results several times faster than our previous implementation. Additionally, structure search results are now sorted by

Improved querying for SureChEMBL

    Dear SureChEMBL users, Earlier this year we ran a survey to identify what you, the users, would like to see next in SureChEMBL. Thank you for offering your feedback! This gave us the opportunity to have some interesting discussions both internally and externally. While we can't publicly reveal precisely our plans for the coming months (everything will be delivered at the right time), we can at least say that improving the compound structure extraction quality is a priority. Unfortunately, the change won't happen overnight as reprocessing 167 millions patents takes a while. However, the good news is that the new generation of optical chemical structure recognition shows good performance, even for patent images! We hope we can share our results with you soon. So in the meantime, what are we doing? You may have noticed a few changes on the SureChEMBL main page. No more "Beta" flag since we consider the system to be stable enough (it does not mean that you will never

ChEMBL brings drug bioactivity data to the Protein Data Bank in Europe

In the quest to develop new drugs, understanding the 3D structure of molecules is crucial. Resources like the Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) provide these 3D blueprints for many biological molecules. However, researchers also need to know how these molecules interact with their biological target – their bioactivity. ChEMBL is a treasure trove of bioactivity data for countless drug-like molecules. It tells us how strongly a molecule binds to a target, how it affects a biological process, and even how it might be metabolized. But here's the catch: while ChEMBL provides extensive information on a molecule's activity and cross references to other data sources, it doesn't always tell us if a 3D structure is available for a specific drug-target complex. This can be a roadblock for researchers who need that structural information to design effective drugs. Therefore, connecting ChEMBL data with resources like PDBe and CSD is essen

ChEMBL 34 is out!

We are delighted to announce the release of ChEMBL 34, which includes a full update to drug and clinical candidate drug data. This version of the database, prepared on 28/03/2024 contains:         2,431,025 compounds (of which 2,409,270 have mol files)         3,106,257 compound records (non-unique compounds)         20,772,701 activities         1,644,390 assays         15,598 targets         89,892 documents Data can be downloaded from the ChEMBL FTP site:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/ Please see ChEMBL_34 release notes for full details of all changes in this release:  https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_34/chembl_34_release_notes.txt New Data Sources European Medicines Agency (src_id = 66): European Medicines Agency's data correspond to EMA drugs prior to 20 January 2023 (excluding vaccines). 71 out of the 882 newly added EMA drugs are only authorised by EMA, rather than from other regulatory bodies e.g.

In search of the perfect assay description

Credit: Science biotech, CC BY-SA 4.0 Assays des cribe the experimental set-up when testing the activity of drug-like compounds against biological targets; they provide useful context for researchers interested in drug-target relationships. Ver sion 33 of ChEMBL contains 1.6 million diverse assays spanning ADMET, physicochemical, binding, functional and toxicity experiments. A set of well-defined and structured assay descriptions would be valuable for the drug discovery community, particularly for text mining and NLP projects. These would also support ChEMBL's ongoing efforts towards an  in vitro  assay classification. This Blog post will consider the features of the 'perfect' assay description and provide a guide for depositors on the submission of high quality data. ChEMBL's assays are typically structured with the overall aim, target, and method .  The ideal assay description is succinct but contains all the necessary information for easy interpretation by database u